A Structure-dependent Causal Diversity Effect in Diagnostic Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Felix G. Rebitschek
  • Josef F. Krems
  • Georg Jahn
چکیده

The purpose in diagnostic reasoning is to find the cause of observed effects by applying knowledge about the effects and their potential causes. In the causal structure linking causes and effects, effects can share causes or be linked more indirectly. The causal diversity effect reflects the increased support of a cause by a more widespread distribution of effects within the underlying causal structure. We report two experiments, in which participants acquired knowledge about causal structures and then evaluated diverse and proximal effect patterns with regard to their support for inferring a cause. The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoning was stronger if participants had acquired integrated knowledge about causal structures. Moreover, teaching a reduced structure with less nodes open to alternative causation of proximal effects decreased the diversity effect. This confirmed that the causal diversity effect results from considering alternative causation and more generally that diagnostic reasoning draws on causal representations.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

From symptoms to causes: diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning.

A single causal agent can often give rise to a cascade of consequences that can be envisioned as a branching pathway in which symptoms are the terminal nodes. In three studies, we investigated whether reasoning about root causes on the basis of such symptoms would conform to a diversity effect analogous to that found in inductive reasoning about properties of hierarchically organized categories...

متن کامل

Structure induction in diagnostic causal reasoning.

Our research examines the normative and descriptive adequacy of alternative computational models of diagnostic reasoning from single effects to single causes. Many theories of diagnostic reasoning are based on the normative assumption that inferences from an effect to its cause should reflect solely the empirically observed conditional probability of cause given effect. We argue against this as...

متن کامل

Causal Asymmetry in Inductive Judgments

We propose a normative model of inductive reasoning about causal arguments, those in which there is a direct causal relation between categories. The model derives inductive judgments from a causal Bayesian network that represents the causal structure of the argument. It supports inferences in the causal direction (e.g. a mother is drug-addicted, how likely is it that her newborn baby is drug-ad...

متن کامل

Causal knowledge and the development of inductive reasoning.

We explored the development of sensitivity to causal relations in children's inductive reasoning. Children (5-, 8-, and 12-year-olds) and adults were given trials in which they decided whether a property known to be possessed by members of one category was also possessed by members of (a) a taxonomically related category or (b) a causally related category. The direction of the causal link was e...

متن کامل

تورش روش‌های آنالیز استاندارد در برآورد اثرات علیتی

Standard methods for estimating exposure effects in longitudinal studies will result in biased estimates of the exposure effect in the presence of time-dependent confounders affected by past exposure.  In the present review article, we first described the assumptions required for estimating the causal effect in longitudinal studies and their structure regarding various types of exposure and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014